How i really believe killing is right. I really think it is fact that killing is right.
Just like narrow minded like some of u thinks that cancer is indeed killer. ( it might be killer as well, we cant be sure)

For cancer, people who kept on commenting here that “cancer is really killer” bla bla2 are narrow-minded. It is not that i say cancer is healer as well. Just open up ur minds that perharps ahyap is true n start to investisgate. Only then u decide for urself which is which.
U kept on saying cancer kills cause u r being told so. All facts u all mentioned (mutation/out of control/take over whole body) is because u r educated so. It might be true n it might be wrong.

Y u guys keep on commenting that ‘CANCERS ARE KILLER CELLS’ ?
Reason is simple. Because ur taught so. Because doctors n experts said so. It might be killer 2day and healer tommorow. Pls open up to thoughts n possibilities.

It is true science keep proving itself wrong from time to time. Ppl ridicule Wegener when he said continents do drift but other geologists (so-called expert) rebuked him like what u guys r doing to ahyap now. They keep on saying ” facts is that continents cant move” . In the end Wegener was right but he died then.

Eventhough ahyap might be 100% wrong. Yesyes, cancer do kills. But his message is all of us might be 100% wrong as well. I too skeptical when he said cancer is healer, but im willing to investigate not just shutdown our brain. Otherwise, whats different of u and muslim terrorists ? Since small , their parents brainwashed them “Jesus is Pig” n “americans r demon people”.
So they accept that as fact n stubbornly hold to that principle. And they smartly bomb lots of innocent people in 911 case then.
Same goes to u guys. We’ve been taught cancer=killer. We might not be sure.

Thats y i believe science is too young to understand God as well.

The only thing that I would add is that I believe that what we THINK plays a massive part – I think the most critical part – in the development and course of cancer and other health (illness) conditions. I believe that thinking negatively about ourselves is TOXIC to our bodies. I believe our body responds to our thoughts about it – thoughts have energy, and they create. If we think negatively (about how we look, what we’ve done/not done, how we should be/shouldn’t be etc.) I believe this is the biggest toxic burden on our body. Our body (who LOVES us) has to work under a constant barrage of critisism and self-hate. This is the biggest toxic burden of all.

By the way, I LOVE your ‘manglish’!! I understand exactly what you’re saying (well, most of the time anyway…) and in many cases you bring an idea to life in a way that ‘correct’ English would not so clearly have described.

Since this is on cancer & diseases & treating the cause …perhaps you & your readers/followers would like to read the following:-

1. http://www.bangkokpost.com/life/family/16308/natural-healer
2. http://www.shirleys-wellness-cafe.com/urine_martha.htm
3. http://www.earthclinic.com/

I just read them last week. Just browse and maybe you will blog more for /against them. It’s good in case readers need some ‘cure’

By the way, Ah Yap, as an English teacher, I disagree with your….I don’t feel Malaysians should be proud of their Manglish but try to improve on it. Yes, just write as you speak or think and then before you post it just add your s/ed/ & check your spelling. I don’t know, you may have lesser hits or MORE.

This is the problem with modern medicine, they make health such a complicated subjects with so many technical terms so all the people think that they will not be able to take care of themselves and the only choice is to rely on ‘professional’ advices. “If I am sick, I must listen to the doctor because only they know what’s wrong with me.”

“Physiology of carcinogenesis”? “Cellular morphology”? This is wikipedia explanation to ‘heart attack’:-

“Myocardial infarction (MI or AMI for acute myocardial infarction), commonly known as a heart attack, occurs when the blood supply to part of the heart is interrupted causing some heart cells to die. This is most commonly due to occlusion (blockage) of a coronary artery following the rupture of a vulnerable atherosclerotic plaque, which is an unstable collection of lipids (like cholesterol) and white blood cells (especially macrophages) in the wall of an artery. The resulting ischemia (restriction in blood supply) and oxygen shortage, if left untreated for a sufficient period of time, can cause damage and/or death (infarction) of heart muscle tissue (myocardium).”

Tell me how many people on earth can understand this easily? Why do we want to make all of this so complicated and so hard to understand? Is being healthy really such a complicated matters? Or modern medicine is actually overdoing it?

> People spends billions in trying to find a cure.

People spends billions in trying to find a cure but still get no results. Opps, what I mean is no treatment results. People still die of cancer. People still suffer all the consequences of the treatment. But still why billion and billion of dollars? Because there are positive results for the capitalism, for the doctors and for the drugs companies. It is all for profit. Doctors and drugs company makes loads of money from that! The ‘cancer’ industry makes billions and billions. And yes, the solution is as simple as stop smoking and eat vegetables at home, plus a little more from that AND that’s the reason doctors and drugs companies refuse to accept it because they can’t make money from that. How much can I charge you by giving you the advice of “eat more vegetables”? You can’t drive a Benz with that. You must have all those expensive machines and equipments, expensive drugs and medicines, expensive treatments and therapy so you can charge the patient an expensive medical bill. In business sense, whether or not you can heal the patient doesn’t matter because what matter is whether you can make money from it. And if you can make money by not delivering results? Why would you want to change? And this is actually the best business model in the world because you still get pay even if you don’t deliver! Drugs companies make more money by investing useless drugs. Doctors make more money by killing cancer patients. Why will they want to change in ‘business sense’ unless their conscience want to?

> Just like to quate an example on lung cancer. If it is really a healing process, tell me for example in lung cancer how do u treat the cause but not the symptoms? can I tell the patient to stop smoking and stay at home eating vegetables everyday despite of him having symptoms of hemoptypsis and tachypnoea everyday and let the cancer cells do its ‘healing’ processes? nope, cannot, he will die very soon.

1. Stop the poisoning. 2. Get what’s already inside out. 3. Give your body what it needs. If you can study 7 years of medicine, why not spend 1 year of energies on the above? Why don’t you spend some time studying on natural healing? (but be warn that you will make less money healing people than killing people) Why don’t you simple do some interview with those who are cured from cancer and have live more than 10, 20 years after that?

> Till to date the people with lung cancer or metastasis to lungs are considered as terminally ill means will die sooner. So, we still need to treat his symptoms, relieve the pain (you don’t understand the pain the cancer can cause to u coz u haven’t got one), stop the hemoptypsis before he died of anemia, give oxygen therapy, give chemotherapy etc.. that is why, palliative medicine has been born.

Statistic can be very misleading and statistic should be used to serve us and not destroy us (so as science observations, theories and conclusions). I have written a long post on that here. I do doubt modern medicine ‘conclusion’ and ’statistic’ to claim that lung cancer is a terminal disease. The problem itself is that ‘assumption’ itself. You assume it as a terminal disease and so you treat it as one and it becomes one. You assume cancer as enemy, you treat it as one and it becomes one.

Another example of modern medicine ‘conclusion’ and ’statistic’ that is way wrong is our food pyramid. For many years we are teach to eat a lot or proteins (animal meat and dairy products) which is at the base of our food pyramid. Why? Because modern medicine get such conclusion from their statistical approach. They look at the whole population of USA and observe what they eat. Then they build the pyramid using the averaged and make it the recommended diet for everyone else! Hey, but they forget the averaged Americans are unhealthy! Taking the same diet they eat will make you end up like them – unhealthy! When using statistic, use it to serve us. When 1 million people out of 10 million is healthy, look at what this 1 million is doing correctly and teach the other 9 million to do the same. Build the food pyramid using that 1 million people!

> Certainly i like to treat the cause, but if i ask you to stop smoking (which is the cause of your lung ca), and let the natural healing continue without giving u any treatment, i guess you will find a lawyer to me la.

Haha, exactly. That’s another challenging problem and that’s why modern medicine refuse to change. They can make hell lots of money when they continue to deliver nothing and at the same time they don’t need to be responsible for anything. Why be pain in the ass and do something else that can’t make so much money and can even get themselves being sued? That’s why it comes back to the patient himself. Do he want to be responsible for himself? Do he still want to live? If he is one of the blamer type (which most are) that believe he is not responsible for anything but someone else does, then he shall seek modern medicine treatments and suffer the consequences himself – death (and let modern medicine make money legally from it). The same with the ego type who can’t think out of the box, who is like a cup full of water that can’t accept new things and new perspectives.

But for those who are responsible for themselves and can think out of the box and see things from more perspectives, you will have more choices. And I want to repeat again that my message to all of you (cancer and non cancer patients) is NOT “prevention is better than cure” but actually cancer is the cure itself and cancer is not a terminal disease! It is never too late to change and it is always better to seek natural healing than modern medicine therapy. You should trust your body healing ability more than those cold machines , those fancy drugs and let people poke holes on you and cut you open. Don’t over trust science, science is still very young to understand a lot of things.

know enough of medical and biology to comment. Good luck, I wish you to live longer.
MKT, well just read my other comments.
Kenny Yap, Gerson Therapy is also an alternative which has similar concept but different content.

I take my time to understand what all of you are writing to help you, I hope you appreciate it.
I hope you can be clear I am not here to challenge anyone’s thought.

My personal view.

Grayness, I think you need more understanding of this topic.
The answer is, alternative treatment doesn’t replace doctors. They made it clear that doctors report is important but when doctor said one only have 6 months to live, there’s no point going for treatment. For some treatments, doctor also said it would only prolong your life about another 6 months but with also comes with certain level of risk.

florence, you need to share with them. Medical practitioners and doctors who agreed with this concept cannot advise their patients to go alternative healing because it violates their profession. Make http://cacare.com/ available to them.

yangsquare, I can’t do much to convince you. Your statment of “Take modern treatment instead, little hope better than no hope” is misleading. What if doctor says you have 1 year to live and there’s nothing much they can do. You then insist on treatment and they approved you to go for treatment but make it clear to you that it is also no hope. What do you think? You should also ask them, can cancer be heal? or be heal with any treatment? Answer is still no. Treatment is just to remove the symptom or kill all cell.

Thomas, there have been talks on TV and radio by by Dr. Chris of http://cacare.com/ Government have no power to replace any alternative with modern treatments. So the talk has its limitation and can’t change rules. If the talk you wanted is to spread the news, then since you now know of this, you have the privilege to give those you know an option. It is not asking them to follow your way, but just allow option to be given to them. It’s their lives and they will make decision for themselves.